A prominent civil Rights Advocacy group-: HUMAN RIGHTS
WRITERS ASSOCIATION OF NIGERIA (HURIWA) has condemned the lack of transparency
and openness in the composition of the Supreme court of Nigeria’s panelists to
adjudicate on the appeal by the opposition presidential candidate in the highly
disputed 2019 presidential poll Alhaji Atiku Abubakar against the Appellate
court’s victory awarded to president Muhammadu Buhari.
HURIWA has also condemned the double standards by the
Federal government to closed the borders for a long period of time because of
the lack of efficient border security but at the same time President Muhammadu
Buhari who kept flying all around the globe refused to sack the Comptrollers General
of Nigerian Customs Service (Retired Colonel Hameed Alli) and Nigerian
Immigration Services (Mohammed Babandede) all Moslem Northerners both of
whom failed spectacularly to prevent the reported influx of smuggled goods and
services into Nigeria for which are the reasons the current administration
arbitrarily closed the borders. The Rights group said the President was being
sectional for retaining the services of his Northern clique that run the badly
secured borders of Nigeria in the Customs and the Immigration departments.
HURIWA said the way and manner that the hierarchy of the
supreme court of Nigeria headed by chief justice of Nigeria Muhammad Tanko has
handled the composition of the panel and the untoward secrecy surrounding the
identity of the justices to sit on the contentious matter of the highest public
interest has rendered the entire process a nullity in the eyes of the general
public given that constitutional democracy thrives and obtains legitimacy when
transparency, openness, fairness are made the fundamental benchmarks in the
dispensation of justice.
HURIWA said the decision by the chief justice of Nigeria
to keep the identities of the panelists closed to his chest contrary to extant
convention whereby the people of Nigeria are democratically informed and full
disclosures made on the panelists, has made the entire scenarios to appear like
government magic. "What is the Chief Justice of Nigeria hiding?"
“As human rights practitioners we condemn the decision
to treat the supreme court’s anticipated handling of the appeal against the
decision of the presidential election petition’s tribunal filed by the
opposition leader and erstwhile vice president, as if it is a top state secret,
makes the entire process to appear like a drama unworthy of the trust, and
buy-in of the people of Nigeria who are the donors of the authority being
exercised by the holder of the office of president of Nigeria. The supreme
court just like any other competent courts of law is recognized under section
6. The people of Nigeria are recognized in section 14(2) (a) of the Nigerian
constitution as the owners of the sovergnity of Nigeria from whom government
through this constitution derives all its powers and authority.”
"The failure to abide by the freedom of information
law and the constitution by not disclosing the identities of justices to hear
the most important public interest litigation has rendered the legitimacy of
the entire process questionable. The Nigerian constitution gives the media in
section 22, the role of the guardian of the public information. So why is the
chief justice of Nigeria treating this list of panelists like there is some
form of secrecy which must not be disclosed to Nigerians?”
“Why inform Nigerians about the date of the hearing but
refused to disclose the names of the justices? This arbitrariness and
unconstitutional secrecy has damaged the process even before it takes off and
this is very unfortunate.”
Relatedly,
HUMAN RIGHTS WRITERS ASSOCIATION OF NIGERIA (HURIWA) said it read with shock
the statement by the Central Bank of Nigeria governor justifying the continuous
closure of the Nigeria's land borders anchoring it on the need to prevent goods
and services from neighboring countries from flooding into Nigeria even without
the apex banking regulator addressing the fundamental issue of failure of the
extant border security architecture which must be reformed holistically in
order for those noble goals of improving the local business climate for
producers and farmers in Nigeria to be attained seamlessly.
HURIWA said: " We just read the Central Bank of
Nigeria (CBN) Governor, Mr. Godwin Emefiele, who listed the gains of border
closure since August to include boosting domestic trade, job creation and
enhancing Nigeria’s economic policies and affirmed that
before the borders would eventually be reopened; affected countries must be
effectively engaged with a view to agreeing on certain terms and conditions.
The Apex banking industry regulator of Nigeria whilst answering
questions from State House correspondents in Abuja after a meeting with
President Muhammadu Buhari before the president’s departure to Saudi Arabia,
Emefiele illustrated how some businesses, which he said had almost collapsed
before the border closure, suddenly became productive barely a week after the
closure. He narrated
the experiences of rice millers and members of the Poultry Association of
Nigeria whom he said had before the closure called him to lament about low
sales, only to witness a sharp rise in demand shortly after the closure. He
described smuggling of foreign products into the country as a major impediment
to the growth of local industries and businesses, adding that rice and poultry
businesses have been booming optimally since the borders were closed."
HURIWA however maintained that closing the borders and
letting the inefficient and ineffective border security administrators to
remain in office is cosmetic and is unjustifiable. The Rights group said
the President must come clean on the border issues and avoid ethno religious
sentiments if his administration is desirous of effectively putting in place a
fool proof border security administration.
No comments:
Post a Comment