The foremost pro-democracy and non-governmental body – HUMAN
RIGHTS WRITERS ASSOCIATION OF NIGERIA (HURIWA) has tasked the hierarchy of the
Nigerian Army to ensure that the operatives deployed for election related
internal security operations are not directly involved in the handling of
election materials.
Besides, the Rights group has expressed optimism that the pledge
of the Chief of Army Staff Lieutenant General Tukur Yusuf Buratai to constitute
a probe panel to investigate alleged interferences by armed security forces
during the conduct of the presidential and parliamentary elections would be
professionally handled and any indicted operatives named, shamed, prosecuted
and punished.
The
Rights group has further tasked the police to clinically fish out the killers
of the two soldiers in Abonnema, Akuku-Toru Local government Area of Rivers
state during the just conducted national polls so they would face the full
wrath of the law even as the group has commended the Army’s high command for
restraining their troops from invading the community in search of the alleged
killers which may lead to further escalation of civil unrest and may inevitably
result in needless killings. HURIWA has called on the Army to encourage the
civil population not to panic or leave their homes for fear of military
reprisals.
“We
want to commend the chief of Army Staff and the GOC in charge of Rivers state
for exhibiting excellent professionalism so far in the handling of the needless
violence targeting soldiers which led to the death of two soldiers. We hereby
asked that this prevailing atmosphere of loyalty to the Nigerian constitution
and adherence to the principle of rule of law must be sustained. May we also
call on the Army to fish out the soldiers responsible for the murder of the
INEC's Ad-Hoc staff killed in the line of duty in Rivers state during the
Presidential election".
"We
urge the Army not to fall into the temptation of reigniting the Odi kind of
military destruction that happened sometimes past in Bayelsa State when similar
killing of soldiers led to sudden military invasion and wanton destruction of
Odi town.”
In a statement by national coordinator Comrade Emmanuel Onwubiko
and National Media Affairs Director Miss Zainab Yusuf, HURIWA reminded soldiers
that the law does not allow them to directly get involved in the logistical
movements of handling of sensitive and non-sensitive electoral materials nor to
actually conduct the polls but only to be on standby to provide security
related activities in aid of the civil authority should the police be
overwhelmed by civil crisis during the elections. The determination of the
Army’s high command to look inwards with a view to finding out alleged
violators of the electoral Act or those amongst the operatives allegedly
implicated in election violence is a very welcomed development.”
“We call on the military to intensify efforts to win hearts and
minds of civilians from across the society and not to carry out internal
military operations in such dreaded forms that would further alienate them from
the civil populace who would erroneously see them as forces of occupation
rather than as men and women of the People’s Army of Nigeria.”
“HURIWA has therefore charged the Army to ensure that the human
rights desks of the Army are extensively involved in the conducts of all
internal military operations to forestall the cases of willful breaches of the
human rights provisions as enshrined in chapter four of the constitution and
universal declarations of human rights.”
“We condemn all forms of electoral violence and the needless
killings of Nigerians during elections. These killings by armed thugs or
suspected operatives of the armed security forces must be forensically probed
and all indicted persons made to face the full wrath of the law. The decision
by the Army’s authority to probe allegations of election related misconducts by
soldiers is qualitatively sound.”
“We pray the Army to ensure that membership of the panel
reflects representations of all facets of the society including credible
representatives of the organized civil society and human rights community in
Nigeria even as the hearings must be open, transparent, free and fair of all
interferences. We believe that the Nigerian Army is a professional institution
and therefore would follow global best practices.”
HURIWA
recalled that Section 33 (1) of the Nigerian Constitution guarantees basic
freedoms thus: “Every person has a right to life, and no one shall be deprived
intentionally of his life, save in execution of the sentence of a court in
respect of a criminal offence of which he has been found guilty in Nigeria.”
Relatedly,
Section 34 (1) of the grund norm stated that: “Every individual is entitled to
respect for the dignity of his person, and accordingly - (a) no person shall be
subject to torture or to inhuman or degrading treatment; (b) no person shall he
held in slavery or servitude; and (c) no person shall be required to perform
forced of compulsory labour.”
HURIWA
said section 42 (1) also prohibits selective deployment of armed forces for
election to specific geopolitical areas since violence is not restricted to
those areas and to avoid discriminatory deployment policy given that the law
says: “A citizen of Nigeria of a particular community, ethnic group,
place of origin, sex, religion or political opinion shall not, by reason only
that he is such a person:- (a) be subjected either expressly by, or in the
practical application of, any law in force in Nigeria or any executive or
administrative action of the government, to disabilities or restrictions to
which citizens of Nigeria of other communities, ethnic groups, places of
origin, sex, religions or political opinions are not made subject; or (b) be
accorded either expressly by, or in the practical application of, any law in
force in Nigeria or any such executive or administrative action, any privilege
or advantage that is not accorded to citizens of Nigeria of other communities,
ethnic groups, places of origin, sex, religions or political opinions.”
HURIWA
particularly stated that the current Army Chief of Staff had published a manual
on the necessity for embedding the human rights desk of the Army during
internal security operations going by the mandates of the Army' human rights
department which unambiguously provides that: "The Human Rights Desk
Officer is responsible to the COAS for:
a.
Receiving and facilitating investigations of human rights
alleges against military personnel and recommending appropriate actions to be
taken.
b.
Facilitating sensitization workshops on human rights IHL and
IHRL to units and formations.
c.
Drafting policy directives for the NA on human rights to
strengthen the institution and foster civil military cooperation and
collaborations with various stakeholders.
d.
Enhance partnership and cooperation with concerned government entities,
local community organization, NGO and private civic oriented groups towards
advancing the cause of human rights."
No comments:
Post a Comment