A prominent Non-Governmental
organization- HUMAN RIGHTS WRITERS ASSOCIATION OF NIGERIA (HURIWA) has asked
the Chief of Army staff Lieutenant General Tukur Yusuf Buratai to ensure that
the military operatives are not misused by Federal government office holders
from Rivers and other states to manipulate the March 9th 2019 governorship and
State Assembly elections nation- wide.
HURIWA said her members on
ground in Rivers State have reported that Federal appointees are apparently
parading about with massive numbers of armed security forces thus threatening the
peace of the State and unduly harassing civilians.
HURIWA has also decided to
approach the Chief of Army staff Lieutenant General Tukur Yusuf Buratai and
international community through their representatives in Nigeria to investigate
allegations that houses of 50 top members of the opposition Peoples Democratic
party (PDP) IN Rivers State have been destroyed and many of these political
opposition leaders arrested by soldiers.
HURIWA has also asked the
Chief of Army staff Lieutenant General Tukur Yusuf Buratai to order the release
of all the political opposition members so arrested if any and to deal with
those who destroyed the housing assets of PDP leaders in Rivers State. The
Rights group said it is because of her belief in constructive partnership with
statutory institutions to improve and human rights that has motivated it to
constructively and meaningfully engage the hierarchies of the armed security
forces to continue to sustain professionalism and adherence to the Principle of
law of law and to protect constitutional democracy from threats by reactionary
elements. HURIWA said the Nigerian Army is administered professionally and
therefore must not tolerate impunity and lawlessness by its operatives or
officers no matter the status.
HURIWA in a statement by the
National Coordinator Comrade Emmanuel Onwubiko and the National Media Affairs
Director Miss Zainab Yusuf cautioned law enforcement agencies to stop parading
suspects or subjecting them to media persecution just as the Rights group
faulted the recent parade of some politicians in Rivers State by the military
over their alleged involvement in election related bribery scam. HURIWA said
the legal principle in Nigeria is such that presumes that all suspected
offenders are innocent until proven guilty. "Only the courts of
competent jurisdiction in line with section 6 of the Nigerian constitution can
reach a determination in all cases and accusations just as it stated that media
trials are antithetical to modernism, legalism and Rule of Law but amounts to
lynch mob justice".
HURIWA stated thus: “We are
aware and we believe that the Army being a professional institution knows that
the presumption of innocence is the legal principle in criminal cases that one
is considered innocent until proven guilty. This basically means that until a
judicial pronouncement on the guilt or otherwise of the accused person is made,
he/she is to be treated the same as a regular person; any suggestion to the
opposite would be a breach of the Fundamental Human Rights of the
individual."
"The Nigerian 1999
Constitution in Section 36(5) guarantees this right. The practicalities of
what this means for you as an individual if you are charged with a crime under
Nigerian law, is that if for any reason you are discriminated against because
of the fact that you are facing a court case, then you can sue for breach of
your Fundamental Human Rights."
"The other element to
the presumption of innocence is that the burden of proving the guilt of the
accused person is on the prosecution. The prosecution is given the
responsibility of producing enough evidence and arguments to prove the guilt of
criminal defendants beyond a reasonable doubt. No matter what
indictment or formal charges are brought against the defendant, and no matter
what the personal feelings of those involved may be, if government prosecution
cannot decisively demonstrate the defendant’s guilt in trial then that person
is legally “not guilty” and free to go."
"36. (5) Every person
who is charged with a criminal offence shall be presumed to be innocent until
he is proved guilty; Provided that nothing in this section shall invalidate any
law by reason only that the law imposes upon any such person the burden of
proving particular facts. "
His Lordship AGUBE JCA in
ALI V. STATE (2012) 10 NWLR PT. 1309 P. 624 PARA D-E
It is trite law that an
accused is presumed innocent until his guilt is established by credible
evidence. The presumption of innocence is a constitutional right of every
person as provided in section 36(5) of the 1999 Constitution (as amended) which
states that: “Every person who is charged with a criminal offence shall be
presumed to be innocent until he is proved guilty”. In Nigeria, personal
liberty of everyone is guaranteed and can only be deprived in exceptional
circumstances. These exceptional circumstances are in Sections 35(1)
(a-f) of the 1999 Constitution (as amended). Though this personal liberty
guaranteed under the constitution can be deprived in exceptional circumstances,
such accused person is not supposed to be detained for an undeterminable or
endless period. The Nigerian constitution makes provision for bail.
HURIWA has also called for
peaceful conduct of the poll and called on the police to arrest and prosecute
violators of extant electoral law. "The intimidation and harassment of
Igbo voters outside of Igbo land is hereby absolutely condemned. INEC must
behave in line with the law and must not repeat the spectacular ethical crimes
and criminal manipulations that happened in the last Presidential and National
Assembly's Elections."
No comments:
Post a Comment