Everyone
has an innate fault line-no doubt. One of mine is that I have an incurable
penchant for engaging in intellectual conversations with female lawyers who bagged
upper levels and/or distinction in their qualifying examinations in the Nigerian
Law School. This is because the Nigerian law school even with recent infiltration
of examination cheats among the lecturers, is still one of the best in terms of
academic standards and excellence.
November
21st 2013 was one of those days I sat with a female lawyer friend and our topic
of discussion was on the move by the federal House of Representatives to legislate
into law the ownership of foreign or offshore bank accounts by political office
holders such as the President, vice president, governors and their deputies, national
and sub-national legislators.
Lady
J as I chose to call her for the purposes of this public debate expressed consternation
that the political elite are on a journey to demolish all the legal frameworks
that seek to check capital flight by public office holders such as the law
banning ownership of foreign accounts.
She
said that she has always suspected political elite of a grand conspiracy to
gradually denigerianize Nigeria so much so that only the extremely poor and
economic wretched of the earth would end up becoming truly Nigerians since they
cannot afford what it takes to acquire foreign citizenship and or set up investments
in Europe or the United States to enable them escape the uncertain future that
befalls corporate Nigeria.
Lady
J used example of the fad among political elite to acquire foreign passports for
themselves and their children as one of the many underground schemes to
denigerianize Nigeria even as she said that the Icing in the cake is the
current move to legalize ownership of foreign accounts.
She
is of the considered view that the current set of national legislators of all
political affiliations are on a collective journey to weaken the operational
capacity of the near-moribund Code of Conduct Bureau and the Code of Conduct
Tribunal.
Speaking
on the mandate and powers of the code of conduct Bureau and its Tribunal, my
mutual friend stated that the current move to amend the Act to enable political
class own and operate foreign accounts is the final nail in the coffin of these
two institutions that over the years have stood by while political office
holders embark on coordinated looting spree.
The
Code of Conduct Bureau and Tribunal Act, Chapter 58 LFN 1990 gave the Bureau
the mandate to establish and maintain a high standard of public morality in the
conduct of government business and to ensure that the actions and behavior of
public officers conform to the highest standards of public morality and
accountability, so says official records.
To
implement the above mandate, section 3, part of the Third Schedule to the 1999
Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria as amended has provided an
enabling legal environment for the bureau to; receive declarations by public
officers under paragraph 12 of part 1 of the fifth schedule to the
constitution.
By
law the code of conduct bureau is to examine the declaration in accordance with
the requirements of the code of conduct or any law; retain custody of such
declaration and make them available for inspection by any citizen of Nigeria on
such terms and conditions as the National Assembly may prescribe.
The
Code of conduct Bureau by the enabling Act is to work vigorously towards ensuring
compliance with and where appropriate, enforce the provisions of the code of
conduct or any law relating thereto; receive complaints about non-compliance
with or breach of the provision of the code of conduct or any law in relation
there to, investigate complaints and, where appropriate, refer such matters to
the code of conduct tribunal.
The
Conduct Bureau by law is independent to such an extent that the law allows it
to appoint, promote, dismiss and exercise disciplinary control over staff of
the code of conduct bureau in accordance with the provisions of an act of the
National Assembly enacted in that behalf and carry out such other functions as
may be conferred upon it by the National Assembly.
Specifically,
Code 3 is on the Prohibition of foreign accounts even as the President, Vice
President, Governor, Deputy Governor, Ministers of the Government of the
Federation and Commissioners of the Governments of the States, members of the
National Assembly and the House of Assembly of the States, and such other public
officers or persons as the National Assembly may by law prescribe shall not
maintain or operate a bank account in any country outside Nigeria.
The
above sacred functions meant to preserve and conserve public fund for Nigerians
in Nigeria, is what the members of the National Assembly are plotting to
undermine through the passage of the legislation to allow the members of the
political class to own and operate foreign bank accounts.
Lady
J further expressed her legal view to my admiration that for over fourteen
years that the 1999 constitution has being in existence as Nigeria’s Supreme
body of laws, there are evidence to show that substantial chunk of public fund disappear
into private accounts of top political office holders even as the Code of
Conduct Bureau and the Tribunal stand by and watch.
In
2003, the then President Olusegun Obasanjo introduced two anti-graft agencies
to stem the tide of monumental heist of public fund but this evil scheme of
outright theft of public fund has not stopped. My friend then wondered how the current
move to liberalize foreign accounts’ ownership will empower the anti-graft
institutions to stop the high volume of capital flight into foreign jurisdictions
of Nigeria’s public fund.
Determined
to push through this agendum of authorizing further grand stealing of public
fund and create safe havens for these stolen public fund, the members of the
Federal House of Representatives are standing logic on its head.
The
underlying reason for banning foreign accounts ownership by political office
holders is to check the proliferation of corrupt practices by these set of
public office holders but now the Federal House is on a predetermined suicidal mission
to wreck the economy of Nigeria by passing this bill authorizing ownership of
foreign bank accounts.
The
bill before the House of Representatives seeking to allow public office holders
to operate foreign bank accounts passed second reading.
It
also makes provision for the details of the assets declared by public officers
to be assessed by members of the public. This angle of the amendment is a subterfuge
targeted at tying a wool of confusion around the eyes of Nigerians to make them
believe that there is national benefit in this move when in actual fact the
members of the political class are aware that most Nigerians are too poor and
weak and are therefore preoccupied with matters of bread and butter than to
worry themselves trying to monitor how politicians operate foreign bank
accounts.
Emmanuel Jime (PDP, Benue), who sponsored the
amendment for an “Act to amend the Code of Conduct and Tribunal Act Cap 15”
definitely stood logic on its head when he argued that the bill aims to make
accessible assets and liabilities declared by public office holders, thereby
making Nigerians to hold public office holders accountable.
Jime said when passed into law, the bill will establish
legal framework which has been missing in the Code of Conduct and Tribunal Act and
offer procedure for records of assets and liabilities declaration for public office
holders to become more public and accessible to all members of the Nigerian public.
This is a grand subterfuge.
Also,
another part of the consolidated bill as sponsored by Rep Bamidele Faparusi
(APC, Ekiti) seeks to provide leave for the bureau necessary for a public
officer to maintain or operate a bank account outside Nigeria.
Rep
Faparusi told the House that section 7 of the Act prohibited public officers in
Nigeria from operating foreign accounts, but “the obvious impracticability of
the law only help in breaching the law”. This is totally illogical and
fallacious because it is inconceivable to convince us that making a law to own
ownership of foreign account will promote transparency and accountability when
in actual fact these legislators know the precarious economic condition of
millions of Nigerians who are in not in any position to access the true picture
of the foreign accounts to be maintained by their representatives in government
when these same sets of politicians have failed to provide good governance
locally.
The
lawmaker not done by his illogical submission proceeded to argue further that
by passing the bill, it would make the leave of the Bureau necessary for a
public officer to maintain or operate a foreign bank account. He said the closure
of public servant’s foreign account was a disservice to such an officer.
A
few good voice of conscience came up during the debate because while contributing
to the debate, Deputy House Leader Rep Leo Ogor cautioned the law-makers of the
possibility of breeding corruption by the amendment, as it tries to curb the menace
and urged the law-makers to strive and operate domicile accounts in the country.
Also,
Rep A’isha Dahiru Binani (PDP, Adamawa) said there have been series of
initiatives ever since the introduction of Code of Conduct Bureau back in 1979
by different leaders, but the “monster has refused to be defeated”, saying the
legislators have to demonstrate the will of crushing corruption in the country.
Good reasoning from Aisha Binani.
Nigerians
who live abroad have also began criticizing this move as anti-Nigeria since
according to them; there is no single foreign public office holder that
maintains bank account in Nigeria. How many American congressmen own accounts
in any of our Nigerian Banks?
The
timing of this move is also suspect given that this is almost five months since
public universities have been shut down due to strike action by the academic
staff union of universities demanding enhanced pay package.
While
the public schools are shut down, children of political elite are all schooling
abroad. What this new sinister move to empower political elites to operate
foreign accounts aims to achieve is to give the corrupt political office
holders the official seal of approval to keep stealing public fund since they can
now have safe havens to store those treasures for themselves and their
children.
It
is difficult to expect the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission and the independent
corrupt practices and allied offences commission to have the capacity and professional
skills to competently monitor how these foreign accounts are maintained given
that both institutions including the Code of Conduct Bureau and Tribunal are
grossly understaffed and indeed have credibility problem to contend with.
I
agree with the conclusion drawn by my friend that the move to create the legal
framework for foreign bank accounts ownership will further compound Nigeria’s
problem of capital flight and money laundering among political office holders.
Nigeria
is said to harbor over 100 million extremely poor families, why are the legislators
making law to take our money abroad rather than create enabling environment to
attract genuine foreign investors and end the vicious circle of poverty?
My
appeal to speaker Aminu Waziri Tambuwal is that he should not allow the hawks
in the House drag him into the misfortune of participating in the grand
conspiracy to empty Nigeria’s public treasury into private accounts of
privileged political office holders. This bill to amend the relevant sections
of Code of Conduct Bureau and Tribunal should be consigned to the dustbin of
history where it belongs even as the legislators should focus more on
effectively checking to make sure that relevant government agencies charged with
delivering good governance and efficient social services to poor Nigerians are
supervised to carry out these mandates and duties.
* Emmanuel Onwubiko; Head, HUMAN RIGHTS
WRITERS’ ASSOCIATION OF Nigeria BLOGS@www.huriwa.blogspot.com;
www.huriwa.org.
22/11/2013.
No comments:
Post a Comment