In
our attempt to proffer better ways of doing and implementing transparent
revenue derivation and sharing formula we turned to the United States where it
is a global view that accountability is their key word even as enforcement
mechanisms are in place to check loopholes and avenues of looting of public
fund. From Wikipedia the online Encyclopedia
we turned to and fortunately we could decipher that the budget of the US
government often begin as the President proposals to the US Congress which
recommends funding levels for the next fiscal year, beginning October 1st. However, congress is the body required by law
to pass a budget annually and to submit the budget passed by both Houses to the
president for signature. Congressional
decisions are governed by rules and legislation regarding the federal budget
process. In Nigeria we have grown used to the frequent and regular acrimony
that ensues each time the Federal Government is required to present budget
proposals to the National Assembly of Nigeria which by law is authorized to
approve all releases and appropriations.
Although
intra-partisan quarrels are noticed in the US but not to the near-infinite and
permanent dimension that BUDGET PRESENTATION AND PROCESS OF PASSING INTO LAW
AND IMPORTANTLY IMPLEMENTATIONS ARE DONE IN Nigeria. In the US, Budget
committees set spending limits for the House and senate committees and for appropriation
subcommittees, which then approve individual appropriation bills to allocate
funding to various federal programs.
Note however, if congress fails to pass an annual
budget (as has been the case since 2009) a series of appropriation bills must
be passed as “stop gap” measures.
After congress approves an appropriations bill, it is sent to
the president who may sign it into law, or may veto it (as he would a budget
when passed by congress). A vetoed bill
is sent back to congress which can pass it into law with a two thirds majority
in each chamber. Congress may also
combine all or some appropriation bills into an omnibus reconciliation bill in
Addition, the president may
request and the Congress may pass supplementary appropriation bills or
emergency supplementary appropriations bill.
BUDGET PRINCIPLES: The United States constitution [article 1,
section 9, clause 7] states that ‘no money shall be drawn from the treasury,
but in consequence of appropriations made by LAW and regular statement and
account of receipts and expenditures of all public money shall be published
from time to time’. Each year, the President of the US submits his budget
request to Congress for the following fiscal year as required by the Budget and
Accounting Act of 1921. Current law [31 U.S.C and 1105[a]] REQUIRES THE
President to submit a budget no earlier than the First Monday in January and
not later than first Monday in February. Typically, Presidents submit budget on
the first Monday in February. Wikipedia however recalled that the submission
has been delayed, in some new President’s first year when the previous
President belonged to a different party.
IMPORTANT POINTS TO
NOTE: The Federal
Budget is calculated largely on a cash basis. That is REVENUES AND outlays ARE
RECOGNIZED WHEN TRANSACTIONS ARE MADE. Meaning that the full long term costs of
entitlement programs such as Medicare, social security and federal portion of
the MEDICAID are not reflected in the Federal Budget. By contrast, the same
Wikipedia that we relied on for the brief research also let us know and
appreciate the fact that many businesses and some other national governments
have adopted forms of accrual accounting, which recognizes obligations and
revenues when they are incurred. The cost of some federal credit and loan
programs, according to provisions of the federal credit Reform Act of 1990 are
calculated on a net present value basis.
FAST FORWARD TO THE US
MAJOR RECEIPTS CATEGORIES: Whereby we are informed that in FISCAL YEAR 2012 THE Federal Government
collected approximately $2.45 tril in tax revenue; up from $147 bill or 6%
versus FISCAL YEAR 2011 revenues of $2.30 tril. Primary receipts categories
included INCOME TAXES [$1, 132 bill or 47%]; social security/social insurance
taxes [$845 bill or 33%] and CORPORATE TAXES [$242 bill or 10%]. Other Revenue
types included excise, estate and gift taxes. REVENUE rose across all
categories in FY2012 versus FY 2011]. FY 2012 revenue were 15.8% GDP versus 15.8%
GDP in FY 2011. TAX REVENUE averaged approximately 18.3% of GROSS DOMESTIC
PRODUCT over the 1970-2009 periods, generally ranging plus and minus 2% from
that level. Tax revenues are significantly affected by the economy. RECESSIONS
typically reduce government tax collections as economic activity slows. For
example tax revenues declined from $2.5 trillion in 2008 to $2.1 trillion in
2009 and remained same in 2010.
An interesting dimension is the way the US government spends
fund for research. The US federal budget has been criticized for spending on
research and action on HARM REDUCTION out of proportion to magnitude of
underlying threats. For example HEART DISEASES, CANCER, STROKES, RESPIRATORY
DISEASES, DIABETES, AND ALZHELMERS diseases claimed about 1, 650,000 US lives
in 2007, when the government spent about $9.6 billion RESEARCHING WAYS TO
ALLEVIATE THOSE ILLNESSES. In contrast, terrorism had claimed about 300 lives
per year an average over the previous decade, but $150 billion was spent to
prevent terrorism, not including even more costly defense and war expenses.
However, a major terrorist attack can cost substantial economic disruption.
BRIEF PRAYERS:
(1) Huge
expenses spent on salaries and allowances of GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS at the center
in both the Executive and especially the Legislature must be pruned down and
the payment system opened up so Nigerians can access correct information of the
exact and actual amount spent in servicing the legislature which for now from
available findings are prohibitive and outrageous. It is a crime against
humanity that while the provisions made for research and provision of other
essential services in the health and educational sectors including Federal
Roads network dwindle by the day and mostly unaccounted for whereas legislators
pay themselves huge allowances outside of what this REVENUE MOBILIZATION FISCAL
AND ALLOCATION COMMISSION publishes to Nigerians will not augur well for an
economy that desires to be stable and advanced.
This commission must fashion ways and means of independently verifying
the actual allowances paid to themselves through their own financial mechanism
at the National Assembly.
(2) In
the event that the constitution may not be realistically amended to accommodate
the radical provisions for the creation of part time legislatures at both
national and subnational levels, then payment of basic salaries to the National
Assembly members must be based on MERIT; COMPETENCES; SKILLS AND ACADEMIC
QUALIFICATIONS OF THE INDIVIDUAL MEMBERS since CIVIL SERVANTS AT BOTH LEVELS
ARE SO CATEGORIZED. Anything outside of this constitution methodology of
payment is tantamount to DISCRIMINATION ON ACCOUNT OF STATUS which is strictly
forbidden in chapter four of the constitution of the FRN [1999 as amended].
(3)
Strategies
for generating better and enhanced incomes from other sources such as
agriculture and solid minerals which abound in all parts of the country must be
found even as we propose introduction of enforceable provisions in our statutes
to engender practice of real fiscal federalism and resource control so the
component parts own and administer their local resources and only pay royalties
and taxes to the Federal Government and distribution of key federal budgetary
releases should be done in such a way that states are encouraged to bid and
compete to win federal funding for strategic facilities that will serve their
people and develop their communities especially the mineral producing and
agricultural rich communities. OVER RELIANCE ON CRUDE OIL REVENUE IS LAZY AND
UNSUSTAINABLE on a longer term. THIS BODY SHOULD RECOMMEND CREATION OF SOCIAL
SECURITY AND SOCIAL INSURANCES TAXES to be collected from business for the care
of our AGED POPULATION AND THE VERY VULNERABLE MEMBERS OF THE SOCIETY just as
is done in other developed societies so we can reduce MASS POVERTY;
MALNUTRITION AND HIGH DEATH RATES…this could also discourage GOVERNMENT
OFFICIALS from amassing wealth from the public fund under their custody. WE
SUPPORT THE NEW MODEL BEING WORKED OUT BY THIS REVENUE COMMISSION WHICH IS
ANCHORED ON HOW TO BAKE BIGGER NATIONAL CAKE RATHER THAN THE PERENNIAL EMPHASIS
WE PAY TO SHARING THE FAST DEPLETING NATIONAL CAKE. THIS COMMISSION SHOULD
MONITOR CUSTOMS; IMMIGRATION AND OTHER REVENUE YIELDING AGENCIES SO THEY ARE
COMPELLED TO MAKE RETURNS APPROPRIATELY TO THE FEDERAL TREASURY. MOST OF THESE
AGENCIES CORNER SUBSTANTIAL PERCENTAGE OF THEIR REVENUE TO SERVICE FRIVOLITIES
AND OTHER MUNDANE AND EXTRA-CONSTITUTIONAL EXPENSES and we believe that all the
loose ends in generating revenues and taxes must be abridged and strict
penalties recommended for indicted offenders in the competent courts of
law. This commission should continue to
encourage the synergy being built between it and credible civil society
organizations in the country even as we propose the setting up of a VIBRANT
CIVIL SOCIETY/NGO’S/CBO’S DEPARTMENT to properly coordinate relations with the
larger members of the civil society for the promotion of open government,
transparency; accountability and zero-tolerance to corruption. We acknowledge
that the current management under the able leadership of a technocrat of note
Engineer Elias Mbam has brought about transformation in the practice of OPEN
AND ACCOUNTABLE MANAGEMENT and it is our call that other agencies learn from this
agency even as we urge that further and better radical transformational
measures be introduced like intensive training and capacity building of the
staff of this commission and recruitment of younger qualified Nigerians on the
basis of merit to take this organization to the highest level of achievements
of their mandate under this current management that is forward looking and
visionary. The fuller presentation of HURIWA will be submitted within one week.
I thank you for listening.
Comrade Emmanuel Nnadozie
Onwubiko;
National Coordinator.
27/9/2013.
The individual and corporate income taxes and the estate tax are all progressive. By contrast, excise taxes are regressive, as are payroll taxes for Social Security and Medicare.
ReplyDeletetax specialist in the UK