Vexed that president Muhammadu Buhari has pressed on
with the draconian declaration of a religious body – Shiites Islamic Movement
of Nigeria as a terrorist group through an ex parte order from a federal high
court, Abuja, the prominent civil rights advocacy group – HUMAN RIGHTS WRITERS
ASSOCIATION OF NIGERIA (HURIWA) has reminded the Nigerian president that no law
allows his administration to kill civilian protesters under whatever guise.
The Rights group responded to the blanket statement by
the president and the inspector general of police Mohammed Adamu that the
members of the outlawed Islamic movement of Nigeria having been so declared a
terrorist group, “can be dealt with anyhow the armed security forces so
wishes”.
HURIWA said the statement from the duo is irrational,
animalistic and unconstitutional and warned the Federal government not to turn
Nigeria into a banana republic.
In a media statement by the national coordinator comrade
Emmanuel Onwubiko and the national media affairs director Miss. Zainab Yusuf,
HURIWA said political leaders of Nigeria at all times and heads of
security forces are bound by international human right laws and must comply by
the rules of engagement because extra-legal execution of totally unarmed
civilian protesters amounts to grave crime against humanity for which
perpetrators would sooner or later face global crimes court for these
atrocities.
HURIWA said that even the use and application of torture
by security forces is absolutely prohibited under municipal and global human
right laws just as the group insists that the Nigerian government has a duty to
also ensure that right to human dignity is extended to all citizens including
even those in conflict with the laws. Section 31(1) of the Nigerian
Constitution guarantees right to life and only allows competent courts of law
to determine offences that are under capital sanctions of the law and not brute
force.
HURIWA which reiterated its absolute condemnation of the
discriminatory ban of constitutionally guaranteed right to freedoms of movement
association and peaceful assembly of those Nigerian citizens loyal to the
Islamic cleric Sheikh Ibraheem El-Zaczacky over his prolonged illegal detention
stated that it is a misconception for the president and the security chiefs to
think they can hide under the excuse that Shiites Islamic movement is
classified as a terror group to open fire with lethal weapons on protesting
civilians who are unarmed. “Any violator of the right to life will pay for the
crime”.
“May we caution president Buhari not to think that his
friend who is the president of an international criminal court in The Hague,
Netherlands can shield him from facing international justice should the widespread
killings by police/soldiers of unarmed Shiites demonstrators continue. Both
himself and all the security chiefs will sooner rather than later be made to
face international justice”
HURIWA reminded government that under military laws the
Nigerian Armed Forces when deployed for either internal or external operations
are bound by the laws of war and international law in the conduct of the
operations.
HURIWA reminded government that the laws regulate and
limit the conduct of operations by acting as checks against arbitrary use of
force just as the human rights threshold demands that government must abide by
the global best practices.
"HURIWA wishes to remind government that from available
legal body of knowledge these human right laws are intended to minimize
unnecessary suffering by combatants and non-combatants during war. The laws of
war and international law are therefore sources of military law in Nigeria and
include the following: The four Geneva Conventions of 1949; the two Additional Protocols of 1977 to
the Geneva Conventions of 1949.Multilateral
and bilateral agreements to which Nigeria is a signatory and have bearing on
military service or operations. The
decisions of: ICC"
"The four Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949 for
the protection of war victims are as follows:
a. Geneva Convention for the Amelioration of the Condition
of the Wounded and Sick in Armed Forces in the Field.
b. Geneva Convention for the Amelioration of the Wounded,
Sick and Shipwrecked Members of Armed Forces at Sea.
c. Geneva Convention Relative to the Treatment of Prisoners
of war.
d. Geneva
Convention Relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War.”
“The two Additional Protocols of 1977 to the Geneva
Conventions of 1949 are to supplement the 1949 Geneva Conventions and modernize
the laws of war. Protocol I deals with the laws of war in international armed
conflicts while Protocol 2 addresses the laws of war applicable in internal
armed conflicts.”
HURIWA reminded government that even military law
scholars have voiced the law based opinion that it is noteworthy that the four
Geneva Conventions and the two additional Protocols of 1977 have been formally
given effect in Nigeria by the enactment of the Geneva Conventions Act Cap G3
Laws of the Federation of Nigeria 2004. In sum, the Conventions and Protocols
which are now an Act of the National Assembly, elaborately spell out the laws
of armed conflicts on the use of force and the legal implication of
disregarding rules regulating the means and methods of warfare, among other
things. Specifically, section 3 of the Act provides for trial and punishment
for breach of the Geneva Conventions as follows; a. In case of grave breach involving willful killing of a
person protected by the Convention, sentence of death. b. In any other such grave breach, imprisonment for 14
years.
HURIWA disclosed that both local and international human
rights groups are keenly watching and taking records of the ongoing military
atrocities targeting civilian protesters including members of Shiites and the
Indigenous people of Biafra (IPOB).
No comments:
Post a Comment