The Agriculture Department abruptly removed all animal welfare reports from its website in February, sparking public
outcry, denouncements from Congress
and a lawsuit. Six months later, we’re
no closer to understanding exactly why the reports were taken down or when all
might be restored.
But recently published information shows one result of the
records sweep: The agency has been inundated with Freedom of Information Act
requests for the documents, which include inspection and enforcement
records about the treatment of animals at more than 10,000
dog-breeding operations, research labs, roadside zoos and other
facilities.
The USDA has cited privacy concerns and litigation for its decision to remove the online records. They
were regularly accessed by animal protection advocates, who used them to
monitor government enforcement of animal welfare laws, as well as by pet
vendors, journalists and researchers. The
agency says it has since restored thousands of the
inspection and annual reports to the website, but many more — including
all inspections of dog breeders and show-horse events regulated
by the Horse Protection Act — remain available only through a FOIA request,
which can take months or years to be approved.
And according to newly released logs, there has been
a dramatic increase in those FOIA requests. Between Feb. 3, the date the
records were removed, and May 15, the agency received 751 requests. The total
was more than double the number received during the same period in 2016.
That’s according to an analysis by Delcianna Winders, a vice
president with the PETA Foundation, who received the logs in late July —
via a FOIA request. The agency posted the logs for January through April last
week. Before the February records purge, the agency posted such logs
on a monthly basis.
Winders said the “astounding” increase demonstrates a
“tremendous public interest” in the documents.
“This burgeoning backlog is entirely attributable to the fact
that they took these records down,” she said, adding that, by her calculation,
more than 70 percent of the requests involved records that would have been
available online before February.
Tanya Espinosa, a spokeswoman for USDA’s Animal and
Plant Health Inspection Service, said
Wednesday that the division now has 1,596 open FOIA requests. The service
“continues to work as expeditiously as possible to search for the requested
records and to process and release them according to requirements of the FOIA
statute,” she said.
Winders said the volume of requests bolsters a lawsuit against the department by
PETA and other animal protection groups, which argue that the agency is legally
required to proactively post records that are frequently requested or are
likely to be. USDA has filed a motion to dismiss the suit, saying that
it misinterprets federal law and that the online publication of
such records was previously done by choice, in part to reduce the FOIA backlog.
The logs show that many requests between February and mid-May
were made by animal protection activists and journalists, some of whom sought
reports written since February or information on the reason for the records removal. But
they also include a request for breeder inspection reports from a man who
said he plans to buy a dog and wanted “to know that my money will not support
animals housed in inhumane conditions”; a dog seller who said she needed to
ensure that her suppliers “have no write-ups”; and a New Jersey state consumer
agency seeking information on one specific breeder.
The USDA has said its decision is not permanent, and
Espinosa said documents not yet reposted remain under review. Activists
say that although the removal was made under the Trump administration, the
transparency backtrack began last fall during the Obama administration, when
the agency stopped posting enforcement records online.
The action has been criticized on Capitol Hill, where
bipartisan groups in the Senate and the House have introduced legislation that
would require the online posting of all Animal Welfare Act and Horse Protection
Act inspection reports and would block violators from getting tax benefits. In
addition, the House appropriations bill approved last month demands that the USDA
“promptly finish reviewing the information on its website, restore all legally
permissible records previously removed, and resume posting on the USDA
website.”
“This situation is
absurd,” Rep. Earl Blumenauer (D-Ore.), a sponsor of the House legislation, said in a
statement. “Why would USDA protect animal abusers? There is no excuse not to
give the public this information. It’s the agency’s job to protect animals.”
Winders, a lawyer who is a plaintiff in the PETA-led lawsuit,
said the lack of easy access to the records hampers the
group’s efforts to identify animals in abusive situations and
has “completely stymied” her research for a law review article on
recidivism by violators. Industries regulated by the USDA, including groups
representing zoos and research labs, also have been critical.
Joe Watson, CEO of Petland, a chain that sells puppies at
about 80 stores nationwide and requires commercial breeders to have at least
two years of clean USDA inspection records, said agency officials have assured
him that inspections continue. But his company now must get reports directly
from breeders instead of from the online database, he said.
“While we applaud government efforts to ensure the privacy of
certain breeder information, we continue to encourage USDA to find a solution
that balances the privacy needs of breeders, while providing relevant
inspection information to the general public,” Watson said in an email. “The
past six months have created an extra burden for our Petland operators;
however, we hope an ultimate solution to inspection report access is soon
forthcoming.”
FROM THE DESK OF ANIMAL RIGHTS WRITERS
ASSOCIATION OF NIGERIA.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/animalia/wp/2017/08/10/people-who-care-about-animal-welfare-are-demanding-information-from-usda/?utm_term=.c7ef119c9a78
No comments:
Post a Comment