Human Rights groups that are
operationally based in the United Kingdom and the United States of America such
as Amnesty International (AI) and Human Rights Watch can comfortably lay claim
to playing significant roles in bringing about civil activism by indigenous
patriots born and bred in those places considered as Third World or developing
nations. These Western based organisations enjoy greater patronage from their
home nations and powerful lobby platforms.
In the days of military dictatorship
in Nigeria, these internationally recognized organizations were at the
forefront of galvanizing global support and solidarity for local groups
campaigning for the restoration of civil rule and respect for human rights of
Nigerians.
But since the advent of civil democracy
particularly since the last three years that the Nigerian State has
consistently faced a barriage of terrorists invasions and bloody attacks
masterminded by a range of freelance armed terrorists amongst which Boko Haram
in the North East of Nigeria ranks first, these two International groups have
played suspicious anti-Nigerian people’s roles. They alongside their home
governments have antagonised Nigeria 's effort to defeat these terrorists and
the decision by the Nigerian government in recent times to go East and look
towards China and Russia for greater multilateral partnerships hasn't gone down
well with the USA and United Kingdom and so the renewed vicious antagonisms of
these Western based groups may have formidable but covert support of their home
governments.
These groups have consistently
engaged in global wide advocacy campaigns castigating the Nigerian Military
Institutions and graphically painting them as aggressors who wantonly violate
the human rights of terrorists.
Because of some of these jaundiced
reports by Human Rights Watch and Amnesty International which portrayed
Nigerian Military as perpetual abusers of human rights, the government of the
immediate past President Goodluck Jonathan totally lost out by way of not
winning the confidence of the leaders of military powers of the USA; UK and
Israel and these negative tendencies of these organisations led to large scale
frustrations of every governmental efforts to equip the Nigeria Army to
confront the emerging threats to Nigeria’s national security and to defend
Nigeria’s territorial integrity from the bombardments of armed terrorists.
Because of the adverse reports by
these organizations that have no physical offices in Nigeria but make use
of local groups and because of the refusal of the Western powers to sell
weapons to Nigeria, these terrorists for six months sacked many towns and
communities leading to the wanton destruction of lives and property of
Nigerians.
The armed Terrorists completely
ravaged and destroyed Baga town in Borno State killing over 5, 000 persons and
in all well over 20,000 Nigerians have lost their lives to the activities of
these armed Islamists even as over a million Nigerians are now internally
displaced with hundreds -of -thousands of others trooping into neighbouring
countries as refugees.
The pains and excruciating
experiences of the victims of terrorism in Nigeria are not the immediate
concern and focus of Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch as they have
consistently written reports to play up the alleged human rights violations
suffered by these suspected mass killers especially those caught in the line of
fire.
It is true that human rights abuses
should not be encouraged even if those facing these abuses are armed terrorists
but the one – sided reports of these Euro-American groups in the west have
forced people of good will to ask whether they are working for the terrorists.
Amnesty International just came out
with a report in which they focused on the condition of detention centers in
the military institutions just as they accused the Nigerian Military of killing
over 8,000 suspected detained terrorists.
Amnesty International (A.I) then
proceeded to list out some top former and serving Nigerian Generals who should
be indicted and prosecuted for war crime by the international criminal court in
the Hague, Netherlands.
A.I submitted this hogwash of a
report to the International criminal court before releasing it to the reading
public. The report contains many fallacious conclusions lacking in substantial
logic and therefore amounted to a Jaundiced hatchet job for some fifth
columnists who do not wish Nigeria well.
The timing of the release of this
report to coincide with the directive by Nigeria’s new president Muhammadu
Buhari to the military to crush Boko Haram is being interpreted to mean that
this UK group is working to promote the interest of the armed terrorists and is
seeking to undermine the resolve of Nigeria’s new government to crush Boko
Haram.
If these military service Chiefs
both retired and serving erroneously listed for prosecution for the so-called
war crimes in the West are rounded up, what Amnesty International is targeting
to achieve is to demoralize the military forces now battling the terrorists in
the North East of Nigeria and to weaken their fighting morale and motivation.
This bad report must be thrown away to the garbage bin.
To fully understand how hollow this
report is, we will delve briefly to quote some aspects of the executive summary
of the report titled: “Stars on their shoulders Blood on their hands, war
crimes committed by the Nigerian military.”
The London based group wrote thus;
“In the course of security operations against Boko Haram in north-east Nigeria,
Nigerian military forces have extrajudicially executed more than 1,200 people;
they have arbitrarily arrested at least 20,000 people, most young men and boys;
and have committed countless acts of torture.
Hundreds, if not thousands of
Nigerians have become victims of enforced disappearance, and at least 7,000
people have died in military detention as a result of starvation, extreme
overcrowding and denial of medical assistance.” These narratives are not
evidenced based and lacks scientific propriety since no medical records were
attached to determine the cause of deaths of these phantom 8,000 'killed' Boko
Haram detainees as alleged by A.I.
To demonstrate that this group has a
preconceived agenda to run down the credibility of the Nigerian military it
also poured out conclusions that are so illogical, very much irrational and
fallacious. They ended up playing the role of prosecutors and Judges at the
same time by listing out those to be indicted including Lietenant General
Azubuike Ihejirika during whose tenure as Chief of Army staff the noble idea of
creating a civil/military human rights department which worked actively to
enlighten soldiers on the rules of engagement during internal operations and
also the sanctity of human rights were promoted.
Amnesty International in its haste
to nail their perceived enemy General Ihejirik and a few others, failed to
properly understand the doctrine of superior/command responsibility.
Hear them; “In the light of its
findings in this report, Amnesty International believes that the following
military officers should be investigated for the war crimes of murder, enforced
disappearance and torture: Major General John A. H. Ewansiha;Major General Obida T.
Ethan; Major General Ahmadu Mohammed; Brigadier General Austin
O. Edokpayi;Brigadier General RO Bamigboye. Others listed were;Lt. General
Azubuike Ihejirika; Admiral Ola Sa’ad Ibrahim. Lt.
General Ken Minimah.
The elementary doctrine of
Superior/Command responsibility when properly examined, shows that Amnesty
International were wrong in reaching those conclusions.
The Peace and Justice Initiative in
a report had stated that; “Command or superior responsibility “is often
misunderstood. First, it is not a form of objective liability whereby a
superior could be held criminally responsible for crimes committed by
subordinates of the accused regardless of his conduct and regardless of what
his knowledge of these crimes.
“The commission of one or more crimes
attributable to a sub ordinate is a pre-requisite for the application of that
doctrine. In addition, the following requirements have been identified as
forming part of the doctrine of superior responsibility under customary
international law: A relationship of superior-subordinate linking the accused
and those who committed the underlying offences at the time of the commission
of the crime; the knowledge on the part of the superior that his subordinates
have committed or taken a culpable part in the commission of a crime or are
about to do so; and a failure on the part of the superior to take necessary and
reasonable measures to prevent or to punish those crimes".
From abundance of facts, I am aware
that General Azubuike Ihejirika has on a number of times made it abundantly
clear that those directly in the chain of command on ground in the North East
of Nigeria must comply to the Rules of engagement and respect human rights.
The military detention centers are
directly under supervisory purview of chief of Defence Staff and has nothing to
do with the chief of Army staff.
Besides, the counter terrorism war
is coordinated by the National Security Adviser. In this report, Amnesty
International left out the National Security Adviser and the Chief of Defence staff
from 2010 to 2012. Why these sinister omissions?
General Ihejirika is known as the
officer who made sure that terrorists in the North East were kept on the run
and before he retired, he almost succeeded in defeating them.
The issue of poor conditions of
prisons and detention centers are national problems that require comprehensive
panacea and so must not be blamed on some good Nigerians like Ihejirika or Alex
Badeh who have sacrificed so much to protect Nigerians from the attacks of our
enemies.
Real patriotic Nigerians admire his
sterling qualities and only sympathizers and sponsors of Boko Haram are in the
forefront of those castigating General Ihejirika’s or indeed Air Chief Marshal
Alex Badeh's good names because they fought these terrorists to a standstill
and in the case of Alex Badeh who is still serving the traditional Northern
military dislikes his phenomenal promotions in the military because he is from
the Northern minority tribe in Adamawa state.
President Buhari must not allow
Amnesty International to distract him if indeed his government wants to
eradicate Boko Haram and restore lasting peace to all parts of Nigeria.
*Emmanuel Onwubiko is Head of Human Rights Writers Association of Nigeria and blogs @www.huriwa.blogspot.com; www.rightsassociationngr.com,www.huriwa.org.
5/6/2015
No comments:
Post a Comment